Process for Reviewing and Approving Repository Content

Topic proposed
- ex: DevOps on z/OS
WG vote to approve topic and identify where it will be placed in the framework
- Do we need a majority or a super-majority?
- What is the number of meeting attendees required to count as a quorum?
Members propose content for the topic.
- Whitepapers, articles, blogs, videos, courses, etc
- Original content or pointers to existing content
- Must the content free?
- Not mention a vendor?
- Not behind a registration gate?
- Claims need to be backed up with data/proof.
WG committee writes our Point of View
- Reviews proposed content as reference material
- As a group, writes an editorial POV
- Curates supporting content based on guidelines and value
Content distributed to the members for review.
- How many days prior to the vote must we distribute the content?
Members vote to include content or not.
- Anything declined needs to have deficiencies identified and the nominator given a chance to remedy and resubmit.

Modernization WG